Difference between revisions of "Smart contract security"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
↑ https://www.getastra.com/blog/security-audit/smart-contract-security/
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | * In 2017, $150 million worth of ETH was stolen from an organization named Parity technologies due to a critical vulnerability present in their Ethereum smart contract. | ||
| + | * In 2016, a DAO called Genesis DAO was compromised by a hacker(s) exploiting a security loophole in the system. Here, hackers stole $50 million worth of ETH from Genesis DAO’s crowdfunding investors. | ||
| + | * In August 2021, one of the biggest cryptocurrency heists happened. Hackers stole $613 million worth of digital currency from a company named Poly Network. They exploited a vulnerability in the digital contracts Poly Network uses. | ||
| + | <ref>https://www.getastra.com/blog/security-audit/smart-contract-security/</ref> | ||
== Related == | == Related == | ||
Revision as of 19:05, 30 May 2022
- In 2017, $150 million worth of ETH was stolen from an organization named Parity technologies due to a critical vulnerability present in their Ethereum smart contract.
- In 2016, a DAO called Genesis DAO was compromised by a hacker(s) exploiting a security loophole in the system. Here, hackers stole $50 million worth of ETH from Genesis DAO’s crowdfunding investors.
- In August 2021, one of the biggest cryptocurrency heists happened. Hackers stole $613 million worth of digital currency from a company named Poly Network. They exploited a vulnerability in the digital contracts Poly Network uses.
Related
See also
- Smart contract, Solidity, Vyper, cardano, Ethereum, Blockchain Oracle, Binance Smart Chain, Truffle, DAO, Boson Protocol, Smart contract security, Solidify, Eopsin, Sourcify, Gelato, OpenZeppelin, Foundry, ERC-6900
Advertising:
