Difference between revisions of "Auto da alloc"

From wikieduonline
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
   Many broken applications don't use fsync() when  
 
   Many broken applications don't use fsync() when  
  noauto_da_alloc replacing existing files via patterns such as
+
  noauto_da_alloc replacing existing files via patterns such as
 
fd = open("foo.new")/write(fd,..)/close(fd)/
 
fd = open("foo.new")/write(fd,..)/close(fd)/
 
rename("foo.new", "foo"), or worse yet,
 
rename("foo.new", "foo"), or worse yet,

Revision as of 11:22, 26 November 2020

auto_da_alloc(*)

 Many broken applications don't use fsync() when 
noauto_da_alloc replacing existing files via patterns such as

fd = open("foo.new")/write(fd,..)/close(fd)/ rename("foo.new", "foo"), or worse yet, fd = open("foo", O_TRUNC)/write(fd,..)/close(fd). If auto_da_alloc is enabled, ext4 will detect the replace-via-rename and replace-via-truncate patterns and force that any delayed allocation blocks are allocated such that at the next journal commit, in the default data=ordered mode, the data blocks of the new file are forced to disk before the rename() operation is committed. This provides roughly the same level of guarantees as ext3, and avoids the "zero-length" problem that can happen when a system crashes before the delayed allocation blocks are forced to disk.


See also

Advertising: