Difference between revisions of "Karpenter.sh/do-not-evict: true"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{lc}} | {{lc}} | ||
| − | Pods without an <code>[[ownerRef]]</code> (also called “controllerless” or "[[naked pods]]") will be [[evicted]] during voluntary node disruption, such as expiration or consolidation. A pod with the [[annotation]] <code>[[karpenter.sh/do-not-evict: true]]</code> will cause its node to be opted out from voluntary node disruption workflows. | + | Pods without an <code>[[ownerRef]]</code> (also called “controllerless” or "[[naked pods]]") will be [[evicted]] during voluntary node disruption, such as expiration or consolidation. A pod with the [[annotation:]] <code>[[karpenter.sh/do-not-evict: true]]</code> will cause its node to be opted out from voluntary node disruption workflows. |
Revision as of 10:26, 3 January 2023
Pods without an ownerRef (also called “controllerless” or "naked pods") will be evicted during voluntary node disruption, such as expiration or consolidation. A pod with the annotation: karpenter.sh/do-not-evict: true will cause its node to be opted out from voluntary node disruption workflows.
Eviction
ConsolidationEmptinessExpiration
See also
- Kubernetes annotations,
kubectl annotate, eks.amazonaws.com, annotations.kubernetes.io, annotations:, ingress.annotations - Karpenter,
karpenter.sh, provisioners.karpenter.sh, Karpenter releases, best practices,karpenter.sh/capacity-type, karpenter.sh/discovery,kind: Provisioner, kind: AWSNodeTemplate,kubectl provisioner,TopologyKey, FailedDraining, Evict, DisruptionBlocked, Karpenter logs,controller., ttlSecondsUntilExpired, KEDA, NodePools, Kind: NodePool, Workload Consolidation, Disruption controls
Advertising:
