Difference between revisions of "Binary repository manager"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
↑ https://about.gitlab.com/devops-tools/jfrog-artifactory-vs-gitlab.html
↑ https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/packages/container_registry/
↑ https://github.blog/2019-05-10-introducing-github-package-registry/
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| − | + | == Characteristics == | |
| − | |||
| − | Characteristics | ||
* High availability | * High availability | ||
* Multi-site replication | * Multi-site replication | ||
Revision as of 14:28, 6 June 2020
This article is a Draft. Help us to complete it.
- Apache Archiva
- Azure Artifacts
- CloudRepo
- JFrog Artifactory (2008-2009)
- GitLab (2011, GitLab itself)[1]: Maven, Docker[2], NPM.
- GitHub Package Registry [3], since May 2019.
- Sonatype Nexus repository manager
- Pulp, open source.
Characteristics
- High availability
- Multi-site replication
- Disaster recovery
- Scalability.
Activities
See also
- Container Registry: JFrog Container Registry, AWS ECR, Azure container registry, VMware Harbor Registry, Google Cloud Registry, Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR), GitLab container registry,
crane, gcr.io, ghcr.io - Binary repository manager: JFrog Artifactory, GitLab, GitHub and Nexus repository manager
- Package managers: dpkg, APT, RPM, YUM, DNF, homebrew, pkgutil, opkg, Helm, pkg and snap, npm, Aptitude, alien, Conan, CRAN, Chocolatey, NuGet, PackageKit, Wajig, pacman, PIP, Apache Ivy, List packages, List files in packages, Spack
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Flexera, FOSSA, GitLab Ultimate, JFrog Xray, Snyk, Sonatype, Synopsys: Black Duck, Veracode, WhiteHat Security, WhiteSource, Bill of Materials (BOM), Semgrep, Clair
- Continuous integration (Continuous delivery): GitLab CI, TeamCity, Travis CI, Jenkins, CloudBees, AWS CodePipelines, Azure Pipelines, XebiaLabs, Codefresh, GitHub, Pipeline, CircleCI, JFrog Pipelines, Concourse CI, Dagger, Bitbucket Pipelines, Buildkite, Google Cloud Build
Advertising:
